Search for: "State of Georgia, et al v. U.S. EPA, et al" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2019, 9:08 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Cavender The federal courts have recently decided two significant Clean Water Act (CWA) cases: State of Georgia, et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am by Paul R. Recupero
Hovland blocked the WOTUS Rule from going into effect in the 24 states that have challenged the legality of the Rule in West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am by Paul R. Recupero
Hovland blocked the WOTUS Rule from going into effect in the 24 states that have challenged the legality of the Rule in West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am by Paul R. Recupero
Hovland blocked the WOTUS Rule from going into effect in the 24 states that have challenged the legality of the Rule in West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Amicus brief of Arkansas et al.Amicus brief of Alabama Forestry Association et al.Amicus brief of National Alliance of Forest Owners et al.Amicus brief of American Forest Resource Council et al. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Amicus brief of Arkansas et al.Amicus brief of Alabama Forestry Association et al.Amicus brief of National Alliance of Forest Owners et al.Amicus brief of American Forest Resource Council et al. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am by WIMS
Reply of petitioners Michigan, et al. filed and more. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Kali Borkoski
Amicus brief of Arkansas et al.Amicus brief of Alabama Forestry Association et al.Amicus brief of National Alliance of Forest Owners et al.Amicus brief of American Forest Resource Council et al. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
  The investment industry has tried to push back, "pressing the importance of environmental, social and governance considerations in U.S. financial markets ahead of an expected pushback from Republican Party aligned officials as they take control of the House. [read post]
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]